TryVouchr, and the problem with proving you're real
For most of my career I've built systems that sit between people and the thing they're trying to get done. Buy a house. Get an insurance quote. Land a job. The same pattern turns up every time. The person at the center of the whole thing is usually the one with the least control over their own information. Everybody else trades it, scores it, ships it around, and the person it actually describes is the last one in the room to get a say.
Hiring is the version of this that broke first under AI.
If you've posted a job in the last year, you already know. One opening pulls hundreds or even thousands of applications and a good chunk of them aren't real. Resumes written by a model and tuned to the exact wording of your posting. Interviews where you can watch the person reading answers off a second screen. And the really good ones, where one person does the interview and somebody else entirely shows up Monday to do the job. Every recruiter I've talked to has basically stopped trying to spot the real ones from a resume, because the resume isn't evidence of anything anymore.
The reflex is to screen harder. More background checks, more surveillance, more hoops for the candidate to clear just to prove they aren't a fraud. I don't buy it. Partly because it's miserable for the people who are exactly who they say they are, and that's most of them. And partly because it takes a person's identity and parks it in somebody else's database again, which is the original problem in a new coat.
TryVouchr is my crack at the other approach.
Easy to say, a lot harder to build. You verify yourself once, you own the result, and you decide who gets to see it. Not a profile some platform rents out to recruiters. Not a report a bureau quietly builds about you and sells. A credential that's yours. It proves you're a real, present human, it follows you from one application to the next, and you can shut it off whenever you feel like it.
For the job seeker it's free, and it stays free. The cost of proving you're real shouldn't land on the person who already is. Employers pay, because employers are the ones with the problem and the budget. Trust got expensive in this market. This is a way to buy a little of it back without lying about it.
A few things I'm holding myself to while I build this.
It's a signal, not a gate. Verifying should help a real candidate stand out. It should not slowly harden into a wall that screens out legitimate people who can't or won't verify. That's a real tension and I haven't solved it, and I'd rather say that plainly than pretend it isn't sitting there.
It shows its work. The credential says exactly what got confirmed and what didn't. A phone check is not an employment check, and the product should never let one pass for the other. Overstating trust is the fastest way to lose it.
The data stays yours. Vouchr doesn't sell it, doesn't run checks behind your back, and doesn't hang onto anything you didn't choose to hand over. Starts with you, stays with you.
I've put a lot of nights and weekends into this. It's early, and I'm writing about it before it's done on purpose, because I'd rather build it out in the open and hear from people who live this problem than vanish for a year and come back with something nobody asked for. If you're job hunting and sick of shouting into the void, or you're hiring and sick of guessing who's real on the other end, I want to hear from you.
More soon.
Member discussion