10 min read

I Would Prefer Not to Be Eaten

The world is not getting worse. People have been awful to each other for as long as there have been people to be awful to. We just built better cameras. This is about what that firehose does to a decent person, and what I did to stop being eaten by it.
I Would Prefer Not to Be Eaten
Photo by Simran Sood / Unsplash

Let me offer you something that should, against all odds, make you feel better.

The world is not getting worse. I know it doesn't feel that way. I know that every time you pick up your phone it reads like the closing chapter of something, like the credits are about to roll on the whole human experiment. But the species you're watching melt down in real time is the same species it has always been. We have been lying, cheating, robbing, warring, and disappointing one another with absolute consistency since the first two humans stood near each other long enough to form an opinion. The Romans turned slaughter into an afternoon's entertainment and sold snacks. Whole empires were built on misery you'd need a strong stomach to read about today. People have been awful to each other for precisely as long as there have been people available to be awful to.

The difference, the only real difference, is that we built better cameras.

That's it. That's the whole horror. Not that humanity took some dark turn sometime around the invention of the smartphone, but that for the first time in the entire run of our existence, every last instance of our oldest behavior is now photographed, uploaded, ranked by how much it'll upset you, and delivered to the soft glowing rectangle six inches from your face before you've even managed to finish your coffee. The cruelty isn't new. The visibility is. We didn't get worse. We got broadcast.

Here's where it starts to actually matter, because there's a word we use for all this that's doing a tremendous amount of quiet damage. We call it being informed. We've dressed the whole thing up in the language of civic responsibility, told ourselves that the constant intake is a duty, that the engaged citizen is the one who knows, at every hour, exactly how bad it all is right now. But that's not what's happening to you. Being informed is something you do. Being fed is something done to you. And somewhere along the way, without anyone asking your permission, the first quietly became the second.

It became the second on purpose. It lets you off a hook you've probably been hanging on. The 24-hour cycle was never engineered to inform you. It was engineered to keep you. Somewhere there is a room, or more accurately a thousand rooms, full of very smart and very well-compensated people whose entire job is to make sure you do not put the phone down. And they figured out a long time ago that the single most reliable way to hold a human being's attention is to make them angry, or frightened, or both. Joy doesn't scale. Outrage does. So you are not weak for getting pulled in every morning. You were not careless. You were hunted, by professionals, with better tools than you have, and the fact that you got caught says nothing about your character. It says they're good at their job.

The trouble is that the thing they're hunting was never built to survive the hunt. Your brain was assembled, over a few hundred thousand years, to manage a tribe of maybe a hundred and fifty people and a horizon you could walk to by sundown. The bad news arrived at the speed of a person walking. The town square had its executions and its hucksters and its mobs, sure, but you had to walk down to the square to see them, and then you went home and milked the cow and that was the end of it. The horror was rationed by geography and by the simple friction of having to go find it.

That friction is gone. The square now follows you into bed, into the bathroom, into the three quiet minutes you finally carved out for yourself, and it never runs out of material because the entire planet is now in scope. Eight billion people's worth of catastrophe, piped into a nervous system that still thinks every threat it sees is standing ten feet away and coming for you specifically. You have been handed a god's-eye view of human nature and a peasant's ability to do anything about it. That gap, between how much you can now see and how little you can actually touch, is the entire engine of the dread. It is not a moral failing that you can't process all of it. Asking your mind to grieve for the whole world before breakfast is like asking a campfire to heat a city. It's not weakness. It's a spec mismatch.

Now before you dismiss all of this as a particularly wordy argument for touching grass, I want to be clear that I am not making this up. Researchers at the Singapore University of Technology and Design published a review recently that lays it out in the kind of dry academic language that makes it harder to argue with. The finding, roughly, is that the human brain evolved to manage a small group of familiar people and immediate, local threats, and that modern environments are triggering those same instincts in a context they were never built for. Infinite social comparison where there used to be thirty familiar faces. Status signals from strangers on screens where there used to be the actual people in your actual village. The paper calls it evolutionary mismatch, which is a polite way of saying your nervous system is running software designed for a world that no longer exists, and it is losing its mind about it accordingly. I used a different word for this earlier. I called it a spec mismatch. Turns out the researchers agree, they just had to publish it in a journal first.

My wife and I take walks in the evening, and this is the thing I've been trying to explain to her for years now, badly, on a loop, like a man who thinks the problem is that he hasn't said it loud enough yet. She is one of the most empathetic people I know. It's among the best things about her. And I keep circling back, in the clumsiest possible terms, to the idea that caring about everything, everyone, all of it, all at once, is not a virtue she should be trying harder at. It's closer to something being done to her.

I never say it right. It comes out sounding like I'm asking her to care less, which is not what I mean and is not a thing I would want even if I could have it. Empathy is one of the best things about us. I believe that without reservation. It's the whole reason we ever climbed down out of the trees and decided to look out for one another, the reason we're a species and not just eight billion animals competing for the same square of dirt. The capacity to feel someone else's pain as if it were your own is, as far as I'm concerned, close to the entire point of being a person.

So that's the knot I keep failing to untie on those walks. The thing I'm asking her to protect is the same thing I'm telling her is hurting her.

Here's the thing I keep failing to say on those walks. Empathy was built as a close-range instrument. It evolved to make you ache for the person right in front of you, the family down the road, the hundred or so faces you actually knew by name. At that distance it's a gift. Point it at your neighbor and it makes you generous. Point it at your kid and it rearranges your entire life without asking permission. It works beautifully, exactly as designed, right up until you try to aim it at the entire planet at once.

Because empathy has no volume knob. It has no off switch and no sense of scale. And when you take an instrument built to feel for a hundred people and ask it to feel for eight billion, all of them suffering, all of them visible, it does not rise nobly to the occasion. It just burns. You are not becoming a better person by trying to feel all of it at once. You are running a delicate system at a thousand times its rated load and calling the smoke a virtue.

And the cruelest part, the part that took me an embarrassingly long time to see, is who this actually destroys. It isn't the cold ones. The callous scroll right past, untouched, blood pressure flat. It's the tender people who get strip-mined by it. The ones who actually feel things. The machine doesn't punish indifference, it rewards it. What it punishes is decency. It takes the single best quality a person has and turns it into the precise mechanism of their exhaustion, and then it serves them another headline, because the feed is never empty and your capacity to care, it turns out, very much is.

So no, I'm not telling you to care less. I'm telling you the opposite. Your ability to care is the most valuable and most finite thing you own, and you have been spending it like it's infinite on things ten thousand miles away that you will never be able to touch. Every ounce of it poured into a tragedy you can't reach is an ounce stolen from the people you actually can. The ones in your kitchen. Your neighborhood. The friend across town who you've been meaning to call. I know this because I did it. I sat at my own table, wrecked over something on the other side of the world that no amount of my suffering would fix, while the real evening, the one with my wife in it, went by unattended. She was right there. And I wasn't.

Empathy is a virtue at arm's length and a slow poison at planetary scale. Same substance. The only thing that changes is the dose.

Once you see that, the supposed value of the constant intake collapses pretty quickly. Knowing about a disaster the minute it breaks, versus an hour later, versus over dinner that night, changes precisely nothing about your ability to affect it. The real-time feed is sold to you as control, as responsibility, as staying on top of things. It is none of those. It is the same information you'd have gotten anyway, delivered earlier and with more cortisol, so that you can carry the weight of it for a few extra hours and accomplish exactly as much as you would have accomplished by not knowing yet, which is nothing. You did not help anyone by finding out first. You just volunteered for more of the hurt.

So I made some changes. Not a dramatic renunciation, no deleting every app and moving to a cabin. Just a quiet rebalancing of where the attention goes. I ride my bike. Two hundred miles in a month, most of it on a trainer in my own home, legs burning, going nowhere, and somehow more present than I'd been in weeks. I sand and refinish a stretch of deck and watch the grain come back up out of the gray. I cook or bake things that immediately attach firmly to a growing waistline. I play golf, which is to say I pay good money to be disappointed in myself outdoors. I read, or at least I have started reading, which in my case is a distinct and much larger category than finishing. I sit with good friends over margaritas talking a spectacular amount of nonsense, the kind that solves nothing and somehow fixes everything, until the light goes and it dawns on us no one's touched a phone in hours. I write things like this, which if I'm being honest are becoming extremely enjoyable for mostly an audience of me. None of it trends. None of it is breaking. All of it is real, and all of it is happening at a distance my hands can actually reach.

A lesser essay would hand you a five-step morning routine and a gratitude journal here. I'm not going to, because I'd have to go lie down afterward. But I will tell you what's actually within reach, because that's the whole point. Call the person you keep meaning to call and let it run long. Cook something that takes longer than it should, badly if you have to, the failure is half the fun. Go outside and move until something hurts in the good way. Fix the thing in the house you've been walking past for a month, the squeaking door, the dead bulb, the drawer that fights you, and feel the absurd, disproportionate satisfaction of a problem that actually stays solved. Learn something useless. Make something with your hands and let it be ugly. Sit with someone you love and put the phone in another room, an actual other room, where its gravitational pull can't reach you. None of this is profound. None of it will save the world, and that's exactly the point, because the world was never yours to save.

I still know what's going on in the world. I want to be clear about that, because this is not an argument for sticking your head in the sand and humming. It's that I stopped going to find the news and discovered the news finds me anyway. The genuinely important things still surface. They reach me through a friend, a conversation, an offhand mention at dinner, the way news traveled for most of human history before we decided we each needed a private firehose. If something matters enough, it arrives. What I gave up was the rest of it, the endless minor catastrophes, the manufactured urgency, the hourly updates on things that will not move whether I watch them or not. I didn't stop caring about the world. I stopped letting an algorithm meter out my caring for me, on its schedule, for its profit.

I won't pretend this is wisdom. I didn't transcend anything. I'm not at peace with the state of the world and I don't think I'm supposed to be. I just figured out that the thing was eating me alive and I would prefer, on balance, not to be eaten. That's not enlightenment. That's self-preservation with a few extra steps.

The world will go on doing what it does whether I watch it tick by minute by minute or not. It does not require my anxiety as a contribution. And the only part of it I was ever actually holding, the only part any of us are ever holding, is the small and unglamorous and deeply real life happening about ten feet in front of us. I'd rather not miss it staring at a screen.